Evaluation and Demonstration of Blockchain Applicability Framework
【Author】 Gourisetti, Sri Nikhil Gupta; Mylrea, Michael; Patangia, Hirak
【Source】IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
【影响因子】8.702
【Abstract】Blockchain technology has been gaining great interest from a variety of industry sectors, including financial, food processing, and power and energy markets. Realizing the strength of blockchain technology beyond the successful application in the cryptocurrency arena, researchers have been evaluating and using blockchain for applications such as supply chain management, transactive industry (both financial and energy), system integrity, device cybersecurity, identity management, and much more. One of the unique elements of the blockchain technology that made it such a captivating technology to researchers is its plethora of features. Some of the features include smart contracts, cryptocurrency and tokenizing, immutable distributed ledger, cryptographic hashing, and digital signature. In addition, there are multiple types of blockchains, such as permissioned/private and permissionless/public, and various consensus models, such as proof-of-work, proof-of-authority, proof-of-burn, and proof-of-stake. Therefore, it is often nontrivial to determine if an application requires a blockchain. If so, what kind of blockchain and consensus is most appropriate? This article discusses the blockchain applicability framework (BAF), which was specifically designed with the purpose to answer those questions. The BAF is divided into five domains, 18 subdomains, and about 100 controls. It is designed to ingest detailed user requirements to perform a weighted evaluation that is built on mathematical constructs to determine the ideal combination of blockchain that is appropriate for an application. Along with the core logical formulation of the BAF, this article depicts the efficacy of the BAF through two use cases.
【Keywords】Blockchain; Peer-to-peer computing; Industries; Rocks; Memory; Cryptocurrency; Process control; Blockchain; blockchain applicability; blockchain suitability; energy markets; permissioned blockchain; permissionless blockchain; private blockchain; proof-of-authority (PoA); proof-of-burn (PoB); proof-of-stake (PoS); proof-of-work (PoW); public blockchain; supply chain management; transactive system
【发表时间】2020 NOV
【收录时间】2022-01-02
【文献类型】
【主题类别】
--
【DOI】 10.1109/TEM.2019.2928280
评论