How to measure the liquidity of cryptocurrency markets?

【Author】 Brauneis, Alexander; Mestel, Roland; Riordan, Ryan; Theissen, Erik

【Source】JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE

【影响因子】3.539

【Abstract】This paper investigates the efficacy of low-frequency transactions-based liquidity measures to describe actual (high-frequency) liquidity. We show that the Corwin and Schultz (2012) and Abdi and Ranaldo (2017) estimators outperform other measures in describing time-series variations, irrespective of the observation frequency, trading venue, high-frequency liquidity benchmark, and cryptocurrency. Both measures perform well during high and low return, volatility and volume periods. The Kyle and Obizhaeva (2016) estimator and the Amihud (2002) illiquidity ratio outperform when estimating liquidity levels. These two estimators also reliably identify liquidity differences between trading venues. Overall, the results suggest that there is not yet a universally best measure but there are reasonably good low-frequency measures. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

【Keywords】Cryptocurrencies; Liquidity; Capital markets

【发表时间】2021 MAR

【收录时间】2022-01-02

【文献类型】

【主题类别】

--